A quick service restaurant — dining room, vestibule, service corridor and crew room.
IndustryFood service / Multi-site
What runs on the twinFloor finishes, area takeoff, phased capital work
Capital projects teams running a multi-site refresh where the floor is most of the budget. This is a twin we built and keep, not an account we hold. Finishes are applied to live geometry and clipped to a room boundary, so one room can change without the rest of the slab changing with it. The area of each patch is the area that gets priced.
A retile is priced per square foot, so the square footage decides the number. It was being taken from an old drawing set that no longer matched the building, and the waste allowance was a percentage somebody remembered using last time.
On a programme running across many restaurants, a few percent of error compounds into a figure worth arguing about.
A finish applied per room, with the area counted as each one is done. The dining room with the existing tile shown on the actual floor slab, then swapped for a replacement finish that stops at the room boundary rather than washing across the whole floor plate. The area for each room is listed as it is applied: dining, vestibule, the service corridor, the crew room. The total lands as a materials figure with waste added, and the rooms that were skipped are named.
The refresh as a capital line. The tile programme placed in a fiscal year alongside the other work due.
Floor condition is logged against the room, so the case for retiling is a history rather than an opinion. Slip complaints and mop-up callouts sit on the same room the scope covers.
Pricing a finish change:
The area is taken off the model, room by room, so the order quantity has a basis.
Seeing it first:
Two tile options on the real floor, in the real room, before a sample box is ordered.
Phasing the work:
Decide which rooms close in which order, and price each phase on its own.
Bring the files you already have. We will show you the twin you keep for the life of the building.